
PLEASE ACCEPT
MY APPOLOGIES
I apologize for being behind in posting my updates. The process is time-consuming, because I have so much going-on with developments in all my cases. I am trying a new idea of posting "relative dates," so you can immediately reference responsive pleadings to an update (motions, responses, notices, etc.)
Attorney Reilly, for Value City Furniture, is throwing fits and tantrums from his frustrations that he must leave this case (03:06-cv-631-M). The Court must make him do so, because he is criminally implicated in the Petition for Grand Jury investigation. Between April 25 - May 1, '08, I have filed eight pleadings in that case.
In my federal lawsuit (03:08-cv-123-T) re: the courthouse tarring, the 90-day deadline for the government to respond is May 5, '08. Yet, attorneys for Defendants U.S. Dept. of Justice and Treasury Dept. have not even made a court appearance. It seems that Washington does not want anything to do with this mess made by Louisville officials. The Court must rule in my favor, hands down, since a non-appearance means NO CONTEST. And incredibly, three judges have recused themselves, thus far, due to this hot potato. So, I am prepared to serve yet another quo warranto if the fourth judge (Amul R. Thapar) refuses to do his ministerial duty.
In fact, in the above fed case, I served an April 21, '08 quo warranto on Phyllis J. Pyles, Head to the Civil Claims Div. at the U.S. Dept. of Justice in Washington. (This is my second quo warranto.) The "certified copy" went to Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI. I hope to have that quo warranto posted for you very soon.
So, as you can see, I'm constantly moving. And I will keep moving until I'm caught-up on the updates.

Next Juris-dictionary Club Meeting, May 13
Last meeting (April 29), Charles Zoeller headed-up discussions about the "rules of evidence." It became very intense, because other members (including myself) were sharing their experiences on handling evidence. Each testimony lead to other respective aspects of our cases, showing that "everything" is linked to the evidence.
Therefore, I hope that we spend more time on this topic.
VONAGE'S Soft Subscription Scam
March 14, '08 update. I sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), because Vonage refused to refund my $44.95. Un-qualified subscribers don't realize how they are being exploited. (Also see the later March 17, '08 update.)
(Vonage finally refunded my money on Mar. 27, '08. A few days later, I received a response from the FTC. For public awareness, I will leave this information posted for a while longer.)

HILLARY CLINTON'S BIG LIE!
It is hard to believe that some people will still vote for Hillary Clinton after she lied multiple times about being under sniper fire in Bosnia (1996).
This is yet another of her "bad judgments," as well as her sense of desperation that compelled her to lie.
Didn't we learn anything from Bush's lies, in both of his presidential campaigns (2000 and 2004)? We know now that selecting the President is very serious business, since people may end-up dying. Therefore, truthfulness should be the first test for choosing a president.
|
|
|
 |
Remember Rosa Parks! -- Judges are not above the LAW.

Daniel L. Cobble 3401 Lesway Ct., #12 Louisville, Kentucky 40220 Phone: 502 / 499-5249 Email: cob@isp.com
|
UPDATE on the PARC OnStreet Saga
You are invited to WITNESS my hearing regarding pending parking tickets at PARC OnStreet, but it has been postponed again. (The original date was May 1st.) The city agency had finally granted the hearing without requiring me to at-first pay the parking fees, but now with the postponement they are again requiring that I at-first pay the tickets.
My response will be to file a relatively simple lawsuit in the Jefferson Co. District Court, citing that PARC OnStreet (the city) is violating the longtime legal doctrine of "the presumption-of-innocence" by requiring payment (or bonding) of tickets prior to a hearing.
Believe it or not, this hearing is potentially important, because I will argue "jurisdiction," on the basis that city and state government have violated their "presumptive contract," by refusing to protect me / my rights. A contract is violated when not carried-out in good faith.
Please see PARC OnStreet's April 2nd letter for the prior hearing schedule and other updates on this issue.

Value City Furniture Missed Deadline for Expert Witnesses on Furniture
Mar. 11, '08 update. Mysteriously, VCF vows to press forward w/ its defense for trial even without its own expert witnesses. The company has 130 stores, and manufactures its own furniture. In this civil case, absent expert witnesses is the same as admitting guilt.
Error Correction: I have been incorrectly reporting that VCF has 230 retail stores. The correct total is 130 stores. I apologize for my error.
|
|